🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam ruling, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to implement a redrawn congressional map that may create several five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three order, issued on Thursday, approves a request by the state to set aside a lower court's injunction that had rejected the new map in November.

Court's Reasoning

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating significant confusion and disrupting the sensitive balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its action.

The district court had determined that Texas had probably grouped voters according to their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to revert to the boundaries created after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Stinging Opposition

In a strongly worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's decision. She contended that it disregarded the work of the district court, observing that its decision was crafted by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order ensures that Texas's new map, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will dictate next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a infraction of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Struggle

This decision occurs during a national contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican majority. Typically, boundary revision happens after a new decade's census. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that might create several more conservative seats. The opposition, for their part, have countered with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas top lawyer praised the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order protected Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that guarantees representation favorable to the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

On the other hand, Democratic officials decried the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

A top Democratic figure argued the court had yet again damaged its credibility by upholding a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.