🔗 Share this article

At first, Trump seemed to embrace a strong stance concerning Ukraine. Following delivering statements of "severe consequences" during the summer should Putin continued blocking peace discussions, the former president eventually introduced major restrictions on the Russian biggest energy firms, Lukoil and Rosneft. This decision seriously hindered Putin's capacity to fund his war effort in Ukraine.

Yet, through his latest detailed peace initiative for Ukraine, reportedly developed by American and Russian officials lacking Ukraine's or EU involvement, Trump has seemingly returned to his pro-Putin approach.

Benefiting Aggression

The former president's initiative would effectively benefit the Russian leader for invading Ukraine while putting Ukraine's democratic system in jeopardy. Despite strong proclamations that "Ukraine's sovereignty will be upheld", significant aspects of the proposal in reality weaken that same autonomy. What represents a Kremlin dream would probably be a disaster for Ukraine.

Showing his business past, the former president continues to view the situation in Ukraine as a mere territorial dispute, like ceding Russia a part of Ukraine's land will please the ruler. Yet, Russia's invasion is not only about controlling a charred region of economically weakened area in eastern Ukraine. Rather, it is about Ukraine's democratic governance – and the Russian leader's apparent desire to eliminate it so it ceases to functions as an attractive standard for the Russian people of the accountable government that Putin's deepening dictatorship withholds them.

Land Surrenders

While freezing in status the currently separated oblasts of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, the initiative would force the nation to surrender the entire Donetsk region. In addition to rewarding Russia with territory that its forces have been unable to occupy in over a decade of fighting, this surrender would make Ukrainian defenses dangerously weakened.

Donetsk is the location of Ukraine's well-known "defensive line", the fortified defensive positions that constitute a key obstacle to Russian advances. Trump would have Ukraine abandon these defenses, giving Putin a unobstructed route to Kyiv should he later decide to restart the conflict.

Armed Forces Restrictions

Additionally, in a move that would enable future hostilities simpler for the Russian military, Trump would mandate Ukraine to cut the size of its armed forces from their existing large number personnel to a limit of six hundred thousand. Importantly, the proposal places no similar constraints on Russian forces.

Apparently as a concession to Russia's efforts to portray Ukraine's legitimate leadership as radicals, the plan asserts: "Any extremist doctrine and actions must be opposed and prohibited." As if to emphasize this element, it requires that "The nation will hold democratic votes in three months" of a truce. However, Trump sets no obligation that the Russian leader endanger his authoritarian rule by conducting votes in Russia.

Security Commitments

Admittedly, the plan makes Russia pledge not to "invade neighboring countries" and to "establish in regulation its stance of peaceful relations towards Europe and Ukraine". But taking into account that the Russian leadership has violated comparable agreements in the past – for example the Budapest accord, in which the Russian government promised to honor Ukraine's territorial integrity in exchange for giving up its former Soviet nuclear weapons, and the previous peace deals, in which Russia promised to a ceasefire and a restoration of seized land in eastern Ukraine to Kyiv – why should we have confidence in Putin now?

For this reason Ukraine has been so insistent on external protection assurances. Although the initiative threatens a "immediate coordinated armed reaction" in case Russia restart its aggression, and provides that "The nation will receive reliable protection assurances", the details range from vague to alarming. The plan would not just deny the nation alliance membership but also preclude alliance nations from positioning military personnel on the nation's land, thereby preventing the peacekeeping contingent, likely commanded by Britain and France, on which the Ukrainian government had been depending to stop Putin from rebuilding his diminished forces, restocking, and resuming aggression.

World Reaction

An additional parallel deal according to sources would offer the nation with a alliance-like protection assurance, in which any future "significant, deliberate, and continuous armed attack" by Russia on Ukraine "will be treated as an assault jeopardizing the peace and security of the transatlantic community." This implies a defense action. However different from a powerful Ukrainian military – Ukraine's most reliable protection against renewed invasion – the success of the parallel accord would hinge on the dedication of alliance members, such as Trump, to respond militarily to Russia's aggression, something they have {not